In Sweden, there is a system of administrative courts which takes into account only administrative cases and is completely separate from the system of general courts. [33] This system has three levels, with 12 provincial administrative courts (förvaltningsrätt) as the first stage, four administrative appeal courts (kammarrätt) as the second level and the Higher Administrative Court of Sweden (Högsta Förvaltningsdomstolen) as the third level. Congress has also established a few special judicial bodies, known as Article I courts, to deal with certain areas of administrative law. The Regulations of the Administrative Court (VwGO), adopted in 1960, regulate legal proceedings before the Administrative Court. The VWGO is divided into five parts, namely the composition of the courts[23], remedies, remedies and review procedures, costs and enforcement15, as well as final clauses and temporary agreements. [24] In French administrative law, judges describe a management contract as having two cumulative criteria, one with regard to the contracting entity (personal criterion) and the other with regard to the content of the contract (essential criterion). While administrative decision-making bodies are often controlled by larger government entities, their decisions could be reviewed by a court of general jurisdiction on the basis of ordinary procedure (United States) or fundamental justice (Canada). Judicial review of administrative decisions differs from an administrative appeal. It was then amended in 1961 and 1981. This version is the model of the 2010 Law on State Administrative Procedures (MSAPA), which maintains continuity with the previous ones.

The reason for this revision is that over the past two decades, state legislators dissatisfied with the legislation and jurisprudence of the authorities have passed laws that modify the administrative decision and the procedure for applying the rules. [39] In addition, according to French case law, the treaty is considered a management contract if it contains one or more clauses that confer on the administrative entity rights that differ in nature or content from those that would be freely accepted by a person and granted under civil or commercial law. For example, this is illustrated when the law gives administrative judicial authorities the power to examine cases relating to management contracts, transactions, liabilities or privileges entered into by a public administration or by services of Parliament in order to ensure the advancement of the public interest. A second example is the case when the law gives the aforementioned authorities the power to investigate a public works contract or a contract for the sale of State immovable property and contracts for the exploitation of public land. . . .