Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2003. The syntax of ditransitive: Evidence from clitics. Berlin: by Gruyter. In Hungarian, verbs have a polypersonal concordance, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only its subject, but also its object (accusative). There is a difference between the case where a particular object is present and the case where the object is indeterminate or if there is no object at all. (Adverbs have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I love someone or something indeterminate), szeretem (I love him, she, or her, or her, specifically), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, me, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, her or her especially). Of course, names or pronouns can specify the exact object. In short, there is agreement between a verb and the person and the number of its subject and the specificity of its object (which often refers more or less precisely to the person). A rare type of arrangement that phonologically copies parts of the head instead of agreeing with a grammatical category.  For example, in Bainouk, this detailed study of the interaction of air conditioning and adequacy in the field of ditransities (and their interaction with passivation/increase), based mainly on data from Greek and Romance languages, also paved the way for a considerable amount of research at the time of climate concordance and doubling. A study in Arabic information models, which is particularly relevant for chord asymmetries in the SV and VS word codes (see also the resolution of agreement in the Coordinations). “Agreement” is the grammatical phenomenon in which the form of a post, such as the name “horses,” requires a second point in the sentence, such as the verb “galop” in some form, i.e.
the “galop” must correspond to “horses” in the number. Although concordance phenomena are some of the most familiar and well-studied aspects of grammar, some fundamental questions have rarely been asked, let alone answered. This book develops a theory of the processes of concordance found in language, and studies why verbs agree with subjects in person, adjectives correspond in number and sex, but not the person, and the names do not agree at all. Explaining these differences leads to a theory that can be applied to all parts of the language and all languages. The word “agreement,” if one refers to a grammatical rule, means that the words used by an author must be aligned with number and sex (if any). For more details on the two main types of agreements, please see below: Object-Verb-Accord and Noun Pronoun. A complete treatment of Morphosyntax Germanic bending systems, which are used in distributed morphology (DM; see Walnut 1997, citing morphological approaches; and Morris Halle and Alex Marantz, 1963, “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection,” in The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, edited by Kenneth L. Hale, Samuel Jay Keyser, and Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 11-176). Although this work does not involve concordance (but rather flexion in general), this work is decisive enough to determine the division of labour between morphology and syntax when dealing formally with chords in a minimalist/DM framework. Modern English doesn`t have much correspondence, although it`s there. In nomine sentences, the adjectives do not show a match with the noun, although pronouns do.
z.B. a szép k-nyveitekkel “with your beautiful books” (“szép”: nice): the suffixes of the plural, the possessive “your” and the fall marking “with” are marked only on the name.